
Observed Personality > Self-Evaluated Personality
Observed personality is better at predicting job performance than self-reported personality.
Observed personality is better at predicting job performance than self-reported personality.
Let’s face it. Quality of Hire might just be the metric to rule them all (at least for TA). It could be that one metric, forged in the fires of mount doom, to validate and rule them all.
But it’s not. Not even close.
Women tend to receive more constructive (negative) feedback in performance reviews, and it often focuses on unrelated personality traits, emotions, and other aspects not linked to actual performance.
The current performance review model is nothing short of broken. It’s bias-ridden, time-consuming, and outcomes are far from actionable enough.
If we decide to treat the people’s experience we are offering to employee’s as a product, we have to treat the employee’s as the customers. Now let’s look at the best in the business, when it comes to maximizing the success of customers.
We need a seismic shift in how we evaluate performance. Gone should be the days of annual reviews that feel more like autopsies than check-ups. Instead, let’s talk about continuous dialogue, regular feedback, and a system that focuses on the behaviors that drive performance.